英語(yǔ)六級(jí)作文預(yù)測(cè)為貧窮投票

Vote for Poverty

　　As all we know, universities offer scholarship to the outstanding academic students. And there is another policy for the students who are outstanding but with limited pockets. However, this policy has caused great controversy, because if someone wants to win the scholarship they must have to make a speech, which requires the current situation and family incoming of poverty. As to this policy, different people have different views.

　　就像我們所知道的，大學(xué)提供獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金給學(xué)業(yè)出眾的學(xué)生。還有另一個(gè)政策就是給那些學(xué)業(yè)出眾但是家庭貧困的學(xué)生提供獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金。然而，這個(gè)政策引發(fā)了巨大的爭(zhēng)議，因?yàn)槟切┫氆@得這個(gè)獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金的學(xué)生必須得做個(gè)演講，要求他們說(shuō)出貧困的現(xiàn)狀，還有他們家庭收入的窘境。對(duì)于這個(gè)政策，不同的人有不同的看法。

　　Some people think this policy hurt the poor students feeling every badly. The poverty-stricken students who want the money supported from university are required to make speech in front of the whole class. They have to list the evidence that could prove their poor situation. Some of them even speak out the tragic experience in their childhood to convince their classmate to vote for them. People who against this poor-mouth speech policy hold the opinion that it makes a double hurt to the poor students, poverty already make them feel bad and they have to expose their poverty to everyone in order to get rid of poverty, which makes their life more sadly.

　　有些人認(rèn)為這個(gè)政策深深地傷害了貧困生的感情。學(xué)校要求那些想得到獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金支助的貧困生必須得在全班面前做個(gè)演講。他們必須得列出能夠證明他們貧困的證據(jù)，有些人還得說(shuō)他們小時(shí)候的悲慘經(jīng)歷來(lái)說(shuō)服同學(xué)們給他投票。反對(duì)這個(gè)哭窮政策的人認(rèn)為這給貧困生造成了雙重的傷害，貧困已經(jīng)讓他們感覺(jué)夠糟的了，現(xiàn)在他們還得為了擺脫貧困而暴露他們貧困的窘境，這讓他們更加悲催了。

　　However, some people think that this kind of speech policy would help the poor students not only in the poverty but also could gain the faith to fight for their poverty. People cannot choose the family they were born into, but they can always choose their future, so if they want to get out of the current situation they have to face it first, and be not afraid to fight for it. No pain no gain.

　　然而，有些人認(rèn)為這樣的演說(shuō)政策不僅能夠幫助貧困生擺脫困境，也能給他們?cè)黾訛閿[脫貧困而奮斗的信念。人們不同選擇他們的出身，但是他們能夠選擇他們的未來(lái)，所以如果他們想走出現(xiàn)在的境遇，他們必須得先面對(duì)它，不能因害怕而不去奮斗。沒(méi)有付出就沒(méi)有收獲。

　　Weighting up there two arguments into account, I am for the former one, the scholarship seats are limited, and the number of poor students are large. Most of them are ended up with nothing. Hence, the policy should be changed.

　　權(quán)衡以上兩個(gè)爭(zhēng)論，我支持前者，獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金的名額有限，但是貧困生的數(shù)量龐大。許多學(xué)生都是到最后什么也沒(méi)得到的。因此，這個(gè)政策應(yīng)該改變一下。

Vote for Poverty

　　As all we know, universities offer scholarship to the outstanding academic students. And there is another policy for the students who are outstanding but with limited pockets. However, this policy has caused great controversy, because if someone wants to win the scholarship they must have to make a speech, which requires the current situation and family incoming of poverty. As to this policy, different people have different views.

　　就像我們所知道的，大學(xué)提供獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金給學(xué)業(yè)出眾的學(xué)生。還有另一個(gè)政策就是給那些學(xué)業(yè)出眾但是家庭貧困的學(xué)生提供獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金。然而，這個(gè)政策引發(fā)了巨大的爭(zhēng)議，因?yàn)槟切┫氆@得這個(gè)獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金的學(xué)生必須得做個(gè)演講，要求他們說(shuō)出貧困的現(xiàn)狀，還有他們家庭收入的窘境。對(duì)于這個(gè)政策，不同的人有不同的看法。

　　Some people think this policy hurt the poor students feeling every badly. The poverty-stricken students who want the money supported from university are required to make speech in front of the whole class. They have to list the evidence that could prove their poor situation. Some of them even speak out the tragic experience in their childhood to convince their classmate to vote for them. People who against this poor-mouth speech policy hold the opinion that it makes a double hurt to the poor students, poverty already make them feel bad and they have to expose their poverty to everyone in order to get rid of poverty, which makes their life more sadly.

　　有些人認(rèn)為這個(gè)政策深深地傷害了貧困生的感情。學(xué)校要求那些想得到獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金支助的貧困生必須得在全班面前做個(gè)演講。他們必須得列出能夠證明他們貧困的證據(jù)，有些人還得說(shuō)他們小時(shí)候的悲慘經(jīng)歷來(lái)說(shuō)服同學(xué)們給他投票。反對(duì)這個(gè)哭窮政策的人認(rèn)為這給貧困生造成了雙重的傷害，貧困已經(jīng)讓他們感覺(jué)夠糟的了，現(xiàn)在他們還得為了擺脫貧困而暴露他們貧困的窘境，這讓他們更加悲催了。

　　However, some people think that this kind of speech policy would help the poor students not only in the poverty but also could gain the faith to fight for their poverty. People cannot choose the family they were born into, but they can always choose their future, so if they want to get out of the current situation they have to face it first, and be not afraid to fight for it. No pain no gain.

　　然而，有些人認(rèn)為這樣的演說(shuō)政策不僅能夠幫助貧困生擺脫困境，也能給他們?cè)黾訛閿[脫貧困而奮斗的信念。人們不同選擇他們的出身，但是他們能夠選擇他們的未來(lái)，所以如果他們想走出現(xiàn)在的境遇，他們必須得先面對(duì)它，不能因害怕而不去奮斗。沒(méi)有付出就沒(méi)有收獲。

　　Weighting up there two arguments into account, I am for the former one, the scholarship seats are limited, and the number of poor students are large. Most of them are ended up with nothing. Hence, the policy should be changed.

　　權(quán)衡以上兩個(gè)爭(zhēng)論，我支持前者，獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金的名額有限，但是貧困生的數(shù)量龐大。許多學(xué)生都是到最后什么也沒(méi)得到的。因此，這個(gè)政策應(yīng)該改變一下。