新版GRE寫作新題庫：Argument54
編輯點(diǎn)評(píng)： GRE寫作需要大家積累一定的寫作素材、鍛煉自己的邏輯思維、多多積累一些有用的句子和詞匯，有了這些基礎(chǔ)以后，就需要大家根據(jù)真題來進(jìn)行練習(xí)寫作了。
Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species extinctions.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
大約7000年前人類到達(dá)了Kaliko島，在3000年內(nèi)曾經(jīng)生活在Kaliko島的樹林中的大型哺乳動(dòng)物絕大多數(shù)已經(jīng)滅絕了。然而人類并不是導(dǎo)致這些物種滅絕的因素，因?yàn)闆]有證據(jù)表明人類與這些哺乳動(dòng)物有很多接觸。而且，考古學(xué)家發(fā)現(xiàn)一些有大量魚骨被拋棄的場所，而他們并沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)存在大型哺乳動(dòng)物骨頭的類似場所，因而人類并沒有獵殺這些哺乳動(dòng)物。因此，一定是一些氣候上的變化或其他環(huán)境因素導(dǎo)致了這些物種的滅絕。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請(qǐng)解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會(huì)對(duì)文章的論證帶來何種影響。
此上就是為大家提供的新版GRE寫作新題庫Argument部分的內(nèi)容，希望大家能夠在練習(xí)中提高自己的寫作水平。
編輯點(diǎn)評(píng)： GRE寫作需要大家積累一定的寫作素材、鍛煉自己的邏輯思維、多多積累一些有用的句子和詞匯，有了這些基礎(chǔ)以后，就需要大家根據(jù)真題來進(jìn)行練習(xí)寫作了。
Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species extinctions.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
大約7000年前人類到達(dá)了Kaliko島，在3000年內(nèi)曾經(jīng)生活在Kaliko島的樹林中的大型哺乳動(dòng)物絕大多數(shù)已經(jīng)滅絕了。然而人類并不是導(dǎo)致這些物種滅絕的因素，因?yàn)闆]有證據(jù)表明人類與這些哺乳動(dòng)物有很多接觸。而且，考古學(xué)家發(fā)現(xiàn)一些有大量魚骨被拋棄的場所，而他們并沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)存在大型哺乳動(dòng)物骨頭的類似場所，因而人類并沒有獵殺這些哺乳動(dòng)物。因此，一定是一些氣候上的變化或其他環(huán)境因素導(dǎo)致了這些物種的滅絕。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請(qǐng)解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會(huì)對(duì)文章的論證帶來何種影響。
此上就是為大家提供的新版GRE寫作新題庫Argument部分的內(nèi)容，希望大家能夠在練習(xí)中提高自己的寫作水平。
