SAT作文評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與評(píng)分過(guò)程詳解
SAT的作文是SAT三大內(nèi)容之一的寫(xiě)作內(nèi)容的一個(gè)組成部分，它同語(yǔ)法考試一起組成了寫(xiě)作考試，寫(xiě)作部分的總分為800分。在這800分中，作文的分?jǐn)?shù)約占總分的1/4，但由于這一分?jǐn)?shù)不僅被單列出來(lái)，而且作文的影印件還被提交給各大學(xué)，所以使得作文顯得尤其重要。可以說(shuō)好的作文分?jǐn)?shù)不一定會(huì)提高你的錄取可能性，但很差的作文分?jǐn)?shù)卻會(huì)使你提前出局。
作文的得分范圍是0-12分。
一、SAT作文考核何種能力
SAT作文正象大家所認(rèn)為的那樣：它是為測(cè)試考生的寫(xiě)作能力而設(shè)置的。至于目前使用的考試形式是否能考出考生的寫(xiě)作能力，卻存在著很大的分歧，一些美國(guó)的教育專(zhuān)家和考試專(zhuān)家認(rèn)為這一考法根本無(wú)法正確評(píng)估考生的寫(xiě)作能力，所以認(rèn)為應(yīng)取消它或改變它。更有專(zhuān)家做了實(shí)驗(yàn)，實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果否定了它的評(píng)估權(quán)威性。實(shí)驗(yàn)是這樣的做的：在某高中隨機(jī)抽出一組學(xué)生，對(duì)他們進(jìn)行作文考試，記下他們的得分。在考核之后對(duì)這些學(xué)生進(jìn)行為期3天的培訓(xùn)和具有針對(duì)性的寫(xiě)作訓(xùn)練，經(jīng)過(guò)3天的強(qiáng)化之后再測(cè)試他們，卻出現(xiàn)了戲劇性的結(jié)果：這組學(xué)生的作文分?jǐn)?shù)平均提高了3分。也就是說(shuō)。經(jīng)過(guò)3天的寫(xiě)作強(qiáng)化，一個(gè)5分學(xué)生竟然可提高到8分，而一個(gè)8分學(xué)生竟然可能提高到了11分。
三天的任何訓(xùn)練都無(wú)法真正提高一個(gè)人的寫(xiě)作水平，這一點(diǎn)作者認(rèn)為是無(wú)可爭(zhēng)議的。那么如何解釋這3分呢？作者不想在此給出任何解釋?zhuān)艚o讀者思考吧。作者只是想說(shuō)這種考試不僅仍然存在著，而且絲毫未變。這一現(xiàn)象對(duì)我們英語(yǔ)是非母語(yǔ)的考生來(lái)說(shuō)，未必是一件壞事，只要你得到要領(lǐng)，做適當(dāng)練習(xí)和必要的考前準(zhǔn)備，或許不止提高3分呢。
在這里作者想告訴大家SAT作文是如此來(lái)考核考生的。在25分鐘的短暫時(shí)間里考生能組織出怎樣的一篇議論文草稿。通過(guò)對(duì)這一草稿的量，質(zhì)和色來(lái)考核考生的寫(xiě)作能力。盡管排出三者的優(yōu)先順序是一件可笑的事。但作者憑經(jīng)驗(yàn)而言，仍想牽強(qiáng)地給出如下的優(yōu)先順序：量〉質(zhì)〉色。
二、SAT作文的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
SAT作文題都是議論文，理想的文章應(yīng)具有以下特點(diǎn)：嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，清晰的論點(diǎn)，有說(shuō)服力的論據(jù)，恰到好處的事例，多樣化的句型，豐富的詞匯和正確的語(yǔ)法。美國(guó)教育考試服務(wù)中心公布了各個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)的作文所具有的特點(diǎn)。下面給出它的原文，供讀者了解、學(xué)習(xí)和掌握。在此評(píng)分的范圍是0-6分。不過(guò)作者想告訴大家，這不是作文評(píng)卷人使用的評(píng)分依據(jù)，因?yàn)樗痪唧w了。
Score of 6
An essay in this category demonstrates clear and consistent mastery, although it may have a few minor errors. A typical essay:
Effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
Is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas
Exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate, and apt vocabulary
Demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure
Is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
Score of 5
An essay in this category demonstrates reasonably consistent mastery, although it will have occasional errors or lapses in quality. A typical essay:
Effectively develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates strong critical thinking, generally using appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
Is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas
Exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary
Demonstrates variety in sentence structure
Is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
Score of 4
An essay in this category demonstrates adequate mastery, although it will have lapses in quality. A typical essay:
Develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates competent critical thinking, using adequate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
Is generally organized and focused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas
Exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabulary
Demonstrates some variety in sentence structure
Has some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
SAT的作文是SAT三大內(nèi)容之一的寫(xiě)作內(nèi)容的一個(gè)組成部分，它同語(yǔ)法考試一起組成了寫(xiě)作考試，寫(xiě)作部分的總分為800分。在這800分中，作文的分?jǐn)?shù)約占總分的1/4，但由于這一分?jǐn)?shù)不僅被單列出來(lái)，而且作文的影印件還被提交給各大學(xué)，所以使得作文顯得尤其重要。可以說(shuō)好的作文分?jǐn)?shù)不一定會(huì)提高你的錄取可能性，但很差的作文分?jǐn)?shù)卻會(huì)使你提前出局。
作文的得分范圍是0-12分。
一、SAT作文考核何種能力
SAT作文正象大家所認(rèn)為的那樣：它是為測(cè)試考生的寫(xiě)作能力而設(shè)置的。至于目前使用的考試形式是否能考出考生的寫(xiě)作能力，卻存在著很大的分歧，一些美國(guó)的教育專(zhuān)家和考試專(zhuān)家認(rèn)為這一考法根本無(wú)法正確評(píng)估考生的寫(xiě)作能力，所以認(rèn)為應(yīng)取消它或改變它。更有專(zhuān)家做了實(shí)驗(yàn)，實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果否定了它的評(píng)估權(quán)威性。實(shí)驗(yàn)是這樣的做的：在某高中隨機(jī)抽出一組學(xué)生，對(duì)他們進(jìn)行作文考試，記下他們的得分。在考核之后對(duì)這些學(xué)生進(jìn)行為期3天的培訓(xùn)和具有針對(duì)性的寫(xiě)作訓(xùn)練，經(jīng)過(guò)3天的強(qiáng)化之后再測(cè)試他們，卻出現(xiàn)了戲劇性的結(jié)果：這組學(xué)生的作文分?jǐn)?shù)平均提高了3分。也就是說(shuō)。經(jīng)過(guò)3天的寫(xiě)作強(qiáng)化，一個(gè)5分學(xué)生竟然可提高到8分，而一個(gè)8分學(xué)生竟然可能提高到了11分。
三天的任何訓(xùn)練都無(wú)法真正提高一個(gè)人的寫(xiě)作水平，這一點(diǎn)作者認(rèn)為是無(wú)可爭(zhēng)議的。那么如何解釋這3分呢？作者不想在此給出任何解釋?zhuān)艚o讀者思考吧。作者只是想說(shuō)這種考試不僅仍然存在著，而且絲毫未變。這一現(xiàn)象對(duì)我們英語(yǔ)是非母語(yǔ)的考生來(lái)說(shuō)，未必是一件壞事，只要你得到要領(lǐng)，做適當(dāng)練習(xí)和必要的考前準(zhǔn)備，或許不止提高3分呢。
在這里作者想告訴大家SAT作文是如此來(lái)考核考生的。在25分鐘的短暫時(shí)間里考生能組織出怎樣的一篇議論文草稿。通過(guò)對(duì)這一草稿的量，質(zhì)和色來(lái)考核考生的寫(xiě)作能力。盡管排出三者的優(yōu)先順序是一件可笑的事。但作者憑經(jīng)驗(yàn)而言，仍想牽強(qiáng)地給出如下的優(yōu)先順序：量〉質(zhì)〉色。
二、SAT作文的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
SAT作文題都是議論文，理想的文章應(yīng)具有以下特點(diǎn)：嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，清晰的論點(diǎn)，有說(shuō)服力的論據(jù)，恰到好處的事例，多樣化的句型，豐富的詞匯和正確的語(yǔ)法。美國(guó)教育考試服務(wù)中心公布了各個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)的作文所具有的特點(diǎn)。下面給出它的原文，供讀者了解、學(xué)習(xí)和掌握。在此評(píng)分的范圍是0-6分。不過(guò)作者想告訴大家，這不是作文評(píng)卷人使用的評(píng)分依據(jù)，因?yàn)樗痪唧w了。
Score of 6
An essay in this category demonstrates clear and consistent mastery, although it may have a few minor errors. A typical essay:
Effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
Is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas
Exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate, and apt vocabulary
Demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure
Is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
Score of 5
An essay in this category demonstrates reasonably consistent mastery, although it will have occasional errors or lapses in quality. A typical essay:
Effectively develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates strong critical thinking, generally using appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
Is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas
Exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary
Demonstrates variety in sentence structure
Is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
Score of 4
An essay in this category demonstrates adequate mastery, although it will have lapses in quality. A typical essay:
Develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates competent critical thinking, using adequate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
Is generally organized and focused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas
Exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabulary
Demonstrates some variety in sentence structure
Has some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
